Cleared Coleman & Kroll

[Godrulesdude]

if u accuse someone, the accused gets cleared & U get attacked; so don't bother

[zeus111]

the 2 members are from different countries and i looked and cant see another game the are in together perhaps u should do lil more home work before u accuse ...in game u posted they attack each other as well ........ no violation here i can see ... just my 2 cents !!!!!!

[Evil Semp]

I deleted your two duplicate topics on these accounts.

Now in regards to your accusations. The accused are CLEARED of being multis.

Now some comments from our sponsor.

Using your criteria for accusing these two as multis take a look at your account. Only 7 games played and won 3 of them. Knows his way around C&A and know what a multi is.

[Godrulesdude]

1. I explained to EvilSemp why there was a mistake with the reports; this was the ONLY report I've ever made;

If I knew my way around C&A, as EvilSemp claims, the revised reports would not have happened.


2. Why attack the paying player who makes the first report of his life? That creates a chilling effect

& discourages paying members from playing.

3. Before buying premium, everyone reads forums. If a person does not know what a "multi" is, they

haven't been playing online games much.

4. There is nothing "sinister" about knowing what a "multi" is.

Its not. Its just a matter of reading forums.

5. You state that I have played only 7 games. You must be referring to "human vs human" games.

I have played many bot games on this website to practice.

6. You did not note that of the 7 games against non-bots I played, most, if not all, were one vs. one usually against fellow

noobs. What does winning less than 50% of games in one vs one games (against other noobs I believe) show? U got some dudes that have beyond 50% & they play against the big doggies

....
Colemanus is listed as an enemy by a disproportionate number of paying players. Among those who commented

negatively about him are the following paying players:

judge_reinhold BoganGod GeneralRisk #1_stunna hector

bottom line: this is the only report I've ever made; there was a rush to judgment to clear the accused & attack the reporting member;

Solution: I have since (for a couple months) played only 1 vs 1 games. That ends the issue of "multis". Now all I have to deal with is angry secret diplomacy dudes coming into my 1 v 1 games to kick my a** bec I reported them. I see posts on forums by a dude who was a premium member for more than 7 years and he got banned for accusing members of "secret diplomacy." Easy solution: stick with 1 v 1 games.

[iAmCaffeine]

I don't think Colemanus is trying to deceive anyone. He's legitimately a bad player.

[Evil Semp]

1. I explained to EvilSemp why there was a mistake with the reports; this was the ONLY report I've ever made;

If I knew my way around C&A, as EvilSemp claims, the revised reports would not have happened.

Moreover, if you looked at the games I cited in the report, you'd know that I misspelled Colemanus' name.

2. Why attack the paying player who makes the first report of his life? That creates a chilling effect

& discourages paying members from playing.

3. Before buying premium, everyone reads forums. If a person does not know what a "multi" is, they

haven't been playing online games much.

4. There is nothing "sinister" about knowing what a "multi" is.

Its not. Its just a matter of reading forums.

5. You state that I have played only 7 games. You must be referring to "human vs human" games.

I have played many bot games on this website to practice.

Also, I've played RISK (the board game) all my life (60+ years).

6. You did not note that of the 7 games against non-bots I played, most, if not all, were one vs. one usually against fellow

noobs. What does winning less than 50% of games in one vs one games (against other noobs I believe) show?

I don't understand.

7. Does anyone know how Colemanus can have played 17000+ games & only be a "cook".

You want research: Here it is: In 2009, Colemanus was a Captain. How can you demote yourself???

This identical issue was raised in the forums by another paying player who had Coleman enter his game.

8. I see that Colemanus made a map for this game. So what?

Colemanus is listed as an enemy by a disproportionate number of paying players. Among those who commented

negatively about him are the following paying players:

judge_reinhold BoganGod GeneralRisk #1_stunna hector



9. When a player enters a noob game with a designation of "cook", you assume that the player is a noob,

like yourself. Its obviously a player trying to deceive the noobs he's up against.

The point of my post was that your criteria for making the report could also be used against you.