timvickers1 & cobracommand [noted]

by **flabio** on Thu Aug 29, 2013 7:09 pm

timvickers1 & cobracommand

Game: 13147547

Accused of being a harsh multi.

Anyone can see for themselves and wholehartedly agree.

by **Evil Semp** on Thu Aug 29, 2013 7:32 pm

flabio wrote:timvickers1 & cobracommand

Game: 13147547

Accused of being a harsh multi.

Anyone can see for themselves and wholehartedly agree.

That is a fog of war game in round 4. All players have attacked neutrals and there is no game chat. How can we see for ourselves?

If you would like to give some details on this accusation it would be helpful. Otherwise I will mark it closed.

by **JCR** on Thu Aug 29, 2013 7:37 pm

flabio wrote:timvickers1 & cobracommand

Game: Game 13147547

Accused of being a harsh multi.

Anyone can see for themselves and wholehartedly agree.

ES
Despite the lack of effort in this report, this is prob worth keeping an eye on. these two are prob not multis but very likely friends. a very large percent of their games are 1v1 against each other and/or multi player games with a very limited number of players that seem to leave the site after a short period of time.
Both joined site within a minute of each other. This particular game showa zero evidence but they "specialize" in PW and may well have decided to work together to gain points.
i would not be surprised to see they were multis, even if not with each other.

by **Evil Semp** on Thu Aug 29, 2013 8:06 pm

JCR wrote:
flabio wrote:timvickers1 & cobracommand

Game: Game 13147547

Accused of being a harsh multi.

Anyone can see for themselves and wholehartedly agree.

ES
Despite the lack of effort in this report, this is prob worth keeping an eye on. these two are prob not multis but very likely friends. a very large percent of their games are 1v1 against each other and/or multi player games with a very limited number of players that seem to leave the site after a short period of time.
Both joined site within a minute of each other. This particular game showa zero evidence but they "specialize" in PW and may well have decided to work together to gain points.
i would not be surprised to see they were multis, even if not with each other.

They are CLEARED of being multi's.

My response was based more on the thought that they were being accused of working together. That is why I didn't just close this report.

by **JCR** on Thu Aug 29, 2013 8:55 pm

your call. just my 2 cents. enough there for a look imho. they are prob just some teenage buddies playing.

by **flabio** on Thu Aug 29, 2013 9:55 pm

Accepted. I'll just have to watch out for them in the future I guess.

by **D00MandD3A7H** on Thu Aug 29, 2013 11:21 pm

flabio wrote:Accepted. I'll just have to watch out for them in the future I guess.

Yes flabio, there is a way to block them from playing you. Click on their name and Add Foe. You wont be bothered again.

by **gcwca_4_life** on Tue Sep 03, 2013 1:23 pm

Game 13155075

Both of them attacked the 3rd player, even though they could have attacked each other, as they were bordering each other, and more than likely knew where each other were.

Ya know, ya prolly should added Mr. Irresistible to this case as well.. haha

Im tooo lazy to post all the games in which these guys did something that SHOULD cause other players to suspect them of secret diplomacy.

But, it seems more so like a group of friends playing, and someone wants to complain because they are getting their ass kicked....

And yes, that is being a sore loser. bahahahaha..

by **king achilles** on Mon Sep 30, 2013 4:18 am

Although Game 13155075 has some suspicious moves by the accused, so far, this game has the strongest possible supporting proof that hey could be working together. For now, this is not enough. This is noted.