Master Ape and illiad - not trying to win or multi[closed]SN

by **SteveHereNow** on Tue Aug 20, 2013 3:46 pm

Accused:
illiad
Master Ape

Other: illiad allowed Master Ape to take three territories without anything in exchange. Truces are normal but giving away territories for nothing is suspicious.
2013-08-15 01:21:16 - Master Ape assaulted ? from ? and conquered it from illiad
2013-08-17 00:40:04 - Master Ape assaulted ? from ? and conquered it from illiad
2013-08-18 10:57:19 - Master Ape assaulted ? from ? and conquered it from illiad
I thought I read there was a rule requiring players to try to win. Giving away territories for nothing is NOT trying to win.
The language of their postings is so similar, they may even be one player with two accounts. Zara, Venice, and Ratisbon were all surrendered by illiad to Master Ape for nothing.

Some of their messages:
2013-08-17 00:41:47 - Master Ape: Dear Blue King, we now have taken Venice back, and will take Ratisbon the next turn. Our realm is reestablished then, we will be satisfied then and not thirst for mor revenge
2013-08-17 14:32:48 - illiad: I am pleased you have safely returned home to claim your golden crown.
2013-08-19 04:56:03 - Master Ape: The people of Ratisbon were chearing, when we entered the city! We thank the blue emperor for his friendship. May his fightings go well in the future. My soldiers are tired now, they will rest for some time now.
2013-08-20 02:11:44 - illiad: Semper fidelis golden monarch! Enjoy the hard-earned rest.

Game number(s):

Game 12938165

Comments:

by **Shino Tenshi** on Tue Aug 20, 2013 7:50 pm

Illiad has been here since Sun Jul 24, 2011 and Master Ape since Sun Dec 02, 2012. This is their first game together in all that time. That hardly screams multi, to me.

by **Jdsizzleslice** on Tue Aug 20, 2013 9:20 pm

Shino Tenshi wrote:Illiad has been here since Sun Jul 24, 2011 and Master Ape since Sun Dec 02, 2012. This is their first game together in all that time. That hardly screams multi, to me.

This is definitely right.

However the gameplay, IMO, seems to indicate that they are the leading 2 people in a Objective map... I don't see anything here. C&A might feel otherwise inclined though.

JD

by **SteveHereNow** on Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:10 pm

The dates of their joining and previous lack of playing together are good indicators of no multi.

But the giving of three territories to the strongest opponent for nothing in exchange is strange. Have you monitors seen that activity in the past?

by **rishaed** on Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:25 pm

Its a fog game, in other words I can't see jack squat. Its like pea soup on a London morning......

by **sniffie** on Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:04 pm

They are not one and the same, that's for sure. I'll leave thins pending till the game is over, can't see a thing in the fog.

I'll leave this topic open, if it becomes a dogfight, I'll close it. No warning, just a reminder.

sniff

by **HaireWolf1** on Mon Aug 26, 2013 8:38 pm

hehehe

by **betiko** on Tue Aug 27, 2013 4:36 pm

Do you even know what happened there? He probably came in with a way too large army to fight it and he let it got to avoid losing troops stupidly since you guys are still all standing. Spurious report.