Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
vtmarik wrote:SolidWolf34 wrote:[u]Unexplained Rulings Threaten Rule of Law[/u]
In 1972-73, with the stated rationale being the pressing caseload in the federal court of appeals, the Board of the Federal Judicial Center moved to make it permissible to not publish opinions that were routine or had no significant precedential value. At that time, all court rulings always had an opinion written with it explaining the law as it applied to the decision made by the court and detailing the reasons upon which the judgment was based.
The new rule that limited what was published did not discuss eliminating the opinion that went with a ruling. It simply said that written opinions would not be published or assumed to be cited as precedent in the future.
But quickly, once rulings were not published, a much more insidious practice emerged - a practice which has the potential to completely undermine the rule of law and the liberty and justice it protects in America. The practice is that of the issuance by federal appeals courts of unpublished rulings that DO NOT STATE THE LEGAL RATIONALE FOR THEIR DECISION. These types of rulings with no reasoning are called nonopinions. Those nonopinions that are unpublished (the vast majority) are called unpublished nonopinions or unexplained decisions. Depending on the circuit, a nonopinion is called affirmance without opinion, summary order, summary disposition, summary opinion, unpublished order, disposition without opinion, abbreviated disposition, summary affirmance, judgment opinion, or simply, an order. Some states call the practice per curiam affirmance.
[/i]
Translation: The fact that Supreme Court Justices can write opinions in Court decisions that have nothing to do with the case at hand or any law is bad.
Relevance: Who the f*ck knows?
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
Iliad wrote:Neutrino wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:...............................
Uhmmmm.....
Okay.
I second that motion.
What, exactly, does that large paragraph have to do with anything?
I will third that.
Anarkistsdream wrote:Iliad wrote:This is hilarious. Solid wolf is probably some 7 year old kid who thinks he knows all the mods and all the policemen in the world
Only cause his daddy touches him at night...
freezie wrote:Iliad wrote:Neutrino wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:...............................
Uhmmmm.....
Okay.
I second that motion.
What, exactly, does that large paragraph have to do with anything?
I will third that.
Can I fourth it?
And I think this long paragraph was to show us what his local policemen could do. Basicly, nothing.
freezie wrote:Can I fourth it?
And I think this long paragraph was to show us what his local policemen could do. Basicly, nothing.
Scalene wrote:Everyone ought to chill. You're not helping things.
vbomb21 wrote:freezie wrote:Iliad wrote:Neutrino wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:...............................
Uhmmmm.....
Okay.
I second that motion.
What, exactly, does that large paragraph have to do with anything?
I will third that.
Can I fourth it?
And I think this long paragraph was to show us what his local policemen could do. Basicly, nothing.
I will go ahead and fifth it and add that he is prolly a little sissy boy 14 year in old catholic prep school with daddy's money who got molested by his priest when he was a child.
firth4eva wrote:ill sixth this even though i dont ghave a clue what im sixthing. i just like quoting and copying others
SolidWolf34 wrote:[u]Unexplained Rulings Threaten Rule of Law[/u]
In 1972-73, with the stated rationale being the pressing caseload in the federal court of appeals, the Board of the Federal Judicial Center moved to make it permissible to not publish opinions that were routine or had no significant precedential value. At that time, all court rulings always had an opinion written with it explaining the law as it applied to the decision made by the court and detailing the reasons upon which the judgment was based.
The new rule that limited what was published did not discuss eliminating the opinion that went with a ruling. It simply said that written opinions would not be published or assumed to be cited as precedent in the future.
But quickly, once rulings were not published, a much more insidious practice emerged - a practice which has the potential to completely undermine the rule of law and the liberty and justice it protects in America. The practice is that of the issuance by federal appeals courts of unpublished rulings that DO NOT STATE THE LEGAL RATIONALE FOR THEIR DECISION. These types of rulings with no reasoning are called nonopinions. Those nonopinions that are unpublished (the vast majority) are called unpublished nonopinions or unexplained decisions. Depending on the circuit, a nonopinion is called affirmance without opinion, summary order, summary disposition, summary opinion, unpublished order, disposition without opinion, abbreviated disposition, summary affirmance, judgment opinion, or simply, an order. Some states call the practice per curiam affirmance.
[/i]
firth4eva wrote:vbomb21 wrote:freezie wrote:Iliad wrote:Neutrino wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:...............................
Uhmmmm.....
Okay.
I second that motion.
What, exactly, does that large paragraph have to do with anything?
I will third that.
Can I fourth it?
And I think this long paragraph was to show us what his local policemen could do. Basicly, nothing.
I will go ahead and fifth it and add that he is prolly a little sissy boy 14 year in old catholic prep school with daddy's money who got molested by his priest when he was a child.
ill sixth this even though i dont ghave a clue what im sixthing. i just like quoting and copying others
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
pancakemix wrote:firth4eva wrote:vbomb21 wrote:freezie wrote:Iliad wrote:Neutrino wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:...............................
Uhmmmm.....
Okay.
I second that motion.
What, exactly, does that large paragraph have to do with anything?
I will third that.
Can I fourth it?
And I think this long paragraph was to show us what his local policemen could do. Basicly, nothing.
I will go ahead and fifth it and add that he is prolly a little sissy boy 14 year in old catholic prep school with daddy's money who got molested by his priest when he was a child.
ill sixth this even though i dont ghave a clue what im sixthing. i just like quoting and copying others
The motion is seventhed
freezie wrote:pancakemix wrote:firth4eva wrote:vbomb21 wrote:freezie wrote:Iliad wrote:Neutrino wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:...............................
Uhmmmm.....
Okay.
I second that motion.
What, exactly, does that large paragraph have to do with anything?
I will third that.
Can I fourth it?
And I think this long paragraph was to show us what his local policemen could do. Basicly, nothing.
I will go ahead and fifth it and add that he is prolly a little sissy boy 14 year in old catholic prep school with daddy's money who got molested by his priest when he was a child.
ill sixth this even though i dont ghave a clue what im sixthing. i just like quoting and copying others
The motion is seventhed
A kiss ( or hug..your choice ) to whoever eight it.
SolidWolf34 wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:SolidWolf34 wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:We alreayd all know Solidwolf is a dildo... Why is this even important...
Oh... yeah... I'ts NOT!
shut the hell up man. why don't u come say it to my face.. all you know what to do is cut squid and take them to bed with you.. so WATCH IT
Why don't I come say that to your face....? Was that a question? If so, use a question mark...
And PM me your address, I'll make sure you get something nice in the mail.
Shut the hell up!! You have been reported to my Local Police Office, I will make sure something is done about what you just said!!
number nine number nine number nine number nine . . .s.xkitten wrote:freezie wrote:pancakemix wrote:firth4eva wrote:vbomb21 wrote:freezie wrote:Iliad wrote:Neutrino wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:...............................
Uhmmmm.....
Okay.
I second that motion.
What, exactly, does that large paragraph have to do with anything?
I will third that.
Can I fourth it?
And I think this long paragraph was to show us what his local policemen could do. Basicly, nothing.
I will go ahead and fifth it and add that he is prolly a little sissy boy 14 year in old catholic prep school with daddy's money who got molested by his priest when he was a child.
ill sixth this even though i dont ghave a clue what im sixthing. i just like quoting and copying others
The motion is seventhed
A kiss ( or hug..your choice ) to whoever eight it.
lol...i'll 8th it...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users