Big cheatingg[cloese]es

by **flamemaster** on Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:56 am

The guy broke the truce that we agreed,before telling me one turn advance...!!!

So we have agreed that not attack on south africa and norvegian claim...and he wrote on chat...but he attack with cheating!!!

Accused:

memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=397415 this is the link of player...

Game number(s):
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=8271777

I hope that some1 will do something about this!!! :evil:

.....ofc he deleted his comments on chat...!!!

by **JBlombier** on Sun Jan 16, 2011 7:11 am

He's not breaking the rules, he's just being a bad sport. If you dislike it, attack back. It seems he is winning, so it worked out pretty well for him. Some will say everything is permitted in war, so is breaking truces.

You can foe him, then you don't have to play him again. And be sure to leave him a rating you find appropriate.

by **Arama86n** on Sun Jan 16, 2011 7:15 am

Read the rules. One is under no obligation to uphold any truces or deals made in game chat. Secret diplomacy is when two or more players conspire by any means other than game chat, to make a truce, pact, or in any way work together to put the other participants of the game at an unfair disadvantage.

Again, I would suggest reading the rules before accusing. If you do not understand the rules there is a "questions & answers" part of the forum.

by **flamemaster** on Sun Jan 16, 2011 7:20 am

Hah...omg so u have a message where he admits the truce on that territories and nothing...ok my next move will be attcaking him on africa then we ll see ... :evil:

by **flamemaster** on Sun Jan 16, 2011 8:59 am

I just hope that u ll play with him...so when u write something about this im going to say the same thing like u... =D>

by **Woodruff** on Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:31 am

flamemaster wrote:I just hope that u ll play with him...so when u write something about this im going to say the same thing like u...

Most of us recognize that no one is obligated to follow through on anything they say, so our strategic plans are set up with that expectation/presumption in mind.

by **Royal Panda** on Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:48 am

Easiest way around these things: Don't do truces!

Never understood where there's ever any benefit to them... decent players will gang up on the strongest player at that point anyway without the need to formally declare it.

by **Caymanmew** on Sun Jan 16, 2011 4:15 pm

Pander88uk wrote:Easiest way around these things: Don't do truces! Never understood where there's ever any benefit to them... decent players will gang up on the strongest player at that point anyway without the need to formally declare it.

there befits to truces but only if they dont fall though if both players do as agreed both then it a good move... of course most time one will attack the other at first chance

by **owenshooter** on Sun Jan 16, 2011 5:31 pm

another spurious report...-the black jesus

by **jefjef** on Sun Jan 16, 2011 5:40 pm

Offering to intentionally throw the game?

2011-01-16 07:56:55 - flamemaster: guys u see he is a cheater lets just deal with him i ll let u win...i promise just to kill this cheater

by **Woodruff** on Sun Jan 16, 2011 8:10 pm

jefjef wrote:Offering to intentionally throw the game?

2011-01-16 07:56:55 - flamemaster: guys u see he is a cheater lets just deal with him i ll let u win...i promise just to kill this cheater

Looks that way to me, too.

by **cutebastard71** on Mon Jan 17, 2011 5:28 am

On the other hand he still didn't DO it, the rule says that violation is throwing a game not OFFERING to throw a game so until he does it there is no violation. He simply may be a quick learner and he is not telling the truth

by **Evil Semp** on Mon Jan 17, 2011 10:46 pm

There isn't a rule on breaking truces. You can rate him accordingly and foe if you like. This is CLOSED.

by **bigheadnick** on Sun Jan 23, 2011 6:08 pm

Pander88uk wrote:Easiest way around these things: Don't do truces! Never understood where there's ever any benefit to them... decent players will gang up on the strongest player at that point anyway without the need to formally declare it.

exactly