REQUEST FOR RULES CLARIFICATION VIS A VIS POLICY [closed]

[Woodruff]

Recently I started a thread which others chose to read and post in.

These "others" now say that I am violating the rules against being "intentionally annoying", all the while I continue to post only in the thread I started.

This is not accurate, as a quick check of the forums will clearly show.

Woodruff - I am allowed to participate in discussion.

You certainly are, which is thoroughly irrelevant to both your statement and mine.

[saxitoxin]

Recently I started a thread which others chose to read and post in.

These "others" now say that I am violating the rules against being "intentionally annoying", all the while I continue to post only in the thread I started.

This is not accurate, as a quick check of the forums will clearly show.

Woodruff - I am allowed to participate in discussion.

You certainly are, which is thoroughly irrelevant to both your statement and mine.

Once again, Woodruff is not the discussion judge.

[Woodruff]

Recently I started a thread which others chose to read and post in.

These "others" now say that I am violating the rules against being "intentionally annoying", all the while I continue to post only in the thread I started.

This is not accurate, as a quick check of the forums will clearly show.

Woodruff - I am allowed to participate in discussion.

You certainly are, which is thoroughly irrelevant to both your statement and mine.

Once again, Woodruff is not the discussion judge.

Nor am I attempting to be, in any way, shape or form. However, I definitely feel another vacation for you coming on...I'm quite sure I'll enjoy it far more than you will.

[saxitoxin]

Nor am I attempting to be, in any way, shape or form. However, I definitely feel another vacation for you coming on...I'm quite sure I'll enjoy it far more than you will.

Woodruff - this was a thread for rules clarification, not a thread for threat-making. Please observe topicality before posting.

Here's a link to the forum guidelines for your review:
viewtopic.php?t=7785

If the main point of your post is about something other than what the OP intended, it's not on topic, even if you did post about how you agree with the OP.

Thank you very much for observing good netiquette,
STX

[Tk 421]

hmm..... this is gonig to be interesting to watch

[colton24]

Nor am I attempting to be, in any way, shape or form. However, I definitely feel another vacation for you coming on...I'm quite sure I'll enjoy it far more than you will.

Woodruff - this was a thread for rules clarification, not a thread for threat-making. Please observe topicality before posting.

Here's a link to the forum guidelines for your review:
viewtopic.php?t=7785

If the main point of your post is about something other than what the OP intended, it's not on topic, even if you did post about how you agree with the OP.

Thank you very much for observing good netiquette,
STX

saxitoxin YOU ARE NOT A MOD so stop telling people to review the rules woodruff isnt breaking any rules at all or trying to be a judge he is giving his OPINION

[sinctheassasin]

Yes, I vote for another vacation for saxitoxin. We would all like that. Man, trying to argue with woodruff was your worst move yet.

[Timminz]

It's unfortunate that you are so blatant in your trollery. Soon, you will be left with nothing but the games here, and I've seen how good you are at that (not at all). It's somewhat of a catch-22. The only thing you're good at is trolling, but if you keep it up you'll be banned, and therefore not able to troll these forums any more. But, don't worry. The sweet, sweet irony is not lost on me.

[Gypsys Kiss]

It's unfortunate that you are so blatant in your trollery.

In which case he is in very good company.

[king achilles]

To answer your query, I can only suggest that you and everyone else as well, to review the Community Guidelines:

viewtopic.php?t=7785

This will also be locked since some of you can't seem to stop flaming or trolling in this thread.