by Loose Canon on Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:11 pm
I think it benefits town to work in some sort of a systemized framework way for lynching.
Particularly when there is as there seems to be at the moment no strong evidence against any player, (and there might never be).
Even though town players particularly those with powers and those with particular suspicions will want to and might justifiably deviate from this.
Early indicative votes seems to have some support.
I am going to re-propose that in the absence of a jailkeeper or a detective (if any) having come forward that Charle nominates one player X for lynching.
(it may be Sonic or Charle may change his mind)
Player X then nominates a second player Y as an alternative for lynching.
We then all argue back and forth as to lynch X, Y or indeed No Lynch.
I don't want to force a claim, although it may be that as a last resort a player on the verge of being lynched might feel their hand is forced.
I do want vote pressure to be applied to see what if anything falls out of it.
Other players may well emerge as more suspicious in the course of the arguing.
And if players don't like this idea I do think they should argue against it.
Maybe now , or maybe as it is tried.
But I do think starting in a systemized way for lynching today is the best course - at least for now.
Arguers????
[img]http://img195.imageshack.us/img195/97/ic2u.png[/img]