Moderator: Cartographers
porkenbeans wrote:A lot of people have black-velvet Elvis's hanging in their living rooms. So, yes, (if you actually think these graphics are good), then you are indeed being insulted. And yes, imo, you are nothing but a "Yes" man.Victor Sullivan wrote:porkenbeans wrote:As it is starting to look now, we are inundated with "yes" men that praise everything that their pals throw up. Even when it is down-right terrible.
Whoa! Are you really insulting those of us who actually like the graphics, now? I think you've gone off the deep end, pork.
The "deep end" is a misnomer. My art critique is an honest one. I am not in any way grinding any axes here. I will continue to give favorable critiques to the artist in question, when they are warranted. But if I think the work is a P.O.S. I will tell it like it is. And to be blunt, if you really think that the graphics are spectacular, then I will loose any respect for your opinion in the future.
You should go back and read this thread. You will find that I already have offered some suggestions, and even spent 2 hours on an illustrated suggestion.Victor Sullivan wrote:porkenbeans wrote:A lot of people have black-velvet Elvis's hanging in their living rooms. So, yes, (if you actually think these graphics are good), then you are indeed being insulted. And yes, imo, you are nothing but a "Yes" man.Victor Sullivan wrote:porkenbeans wrote:As it is starting to look now, we are inundated with "yes" men that praise everything that their pals throw up. Even when it is down-right terrible.
Whoa! Are you really insulting those of us who actually like the graphics, now? I think you've gone off the deep end, pork.
The "deep end" is a misnomer. My art critique is an honest one. I am not in any way grinding any axes here. I will continue to give favorable critiques to the artist in question, when they are warranted. But if I think the work is a P.O.S. I will tell it like it is. And to be blunt, if you really think that the graphics are spectacular, then I will loose any respect for your opinion in the future.
Wtf, pork!? I'm losing respect for you. I think the graphics are fine, and I stand by my opinion. For heaven's sake, it's a goddamn cube, pork! If you think the graphics are trash, then what are your suggestions for fixing the it? So far, I've read nothing but blatant disrespect for paulk and the commenters here and you bitching about the graphics with no real means of helping paulk to see what needs fixed. You need to watch it, pork.
-Sully
porkenbeans wrote:You should go back and read this thread. You will find that I already have offered some suggestions, and even spent 2 hours on an illustrated suggestion.Victor Sullivan wrote:porkenbeans wrote:A lot of people have black-velvet Elvis's hanging in their living rooms. So, yes, (if you actually think these graphics are good), then you are indeed being insulted. And yes, imo, you are nothing but a "Yes" man.Victor Sullivan wrote:porkenbeans wrote:As it is starting to look now, we are inundated with "yes" men that praise everything that their pals throw up. Even when it is down-right terrible.
Whoa! Are you really insulting those of us who actually like the graphics, now? I think you've gone off the deep end, pork.
The "deep end" is a misnomer. My art critique is an honest one. I am not in any way grinding any axes here. I will continue to give favorable critiques to the artist in question, when they are warranted. But if I think the work is a P.O.S. I will tell it like it is. And to be blunt, if you really think that the graphics are spectacular, then I will loose any respect for your opinion in the future.
Wtf, pork!? I'm losing respect for you. I think the graphics are fine, and I stand by my opinion. For heaven's sake, it's a goddamn cube, pork! If you think the graphics are trash, then what are your suggestions for fixing the it? So far, I've read nothing but blatant disrespect for paulk and the commenters here and you bitching about the graphics with no real means of helping paulk to see what needs fixed. You need to watch it, pork.
-Sully
I have no disrespect for paulk. Where do you get this crap from ?
I am not "bitching" about the graphics. I am only stating my honest, and nonpartisan views about this artwork. I do not dislike everything that natty does, and I have said so on numerous projects. Can you say the same ? Can you show me one post where you are not utterly delighted with everything he does.
I do not appreciate how you cut and pieced together my quote. I did not say that I am loosing respect for you. I said that if you truly believe that this artwork is spectacular, then I will loose respect for your opinion in the future. Big difference, and nothing to jump up and down about.
Your intimidation attempt will not work. Who do you think you are telling me that I better watch it ? I am not a Yes man for you or anyone else. I am allowed like everyone else to, offer honest opinions. paulk can take what he will from the opinions of those that offer them.
The Bison King wrote:
porkenbeans wrote:I try to live with this attitude as well, but if we are going to run any kind of decent Map Foundry, we should just keep in mind not to attack an artist personally. And if you feel strongly about one thing or another, feel free to voice your honest opinion, be it good or bad.
I am not accusing you of anything Vic.Victor Sullivan wrote:porkenbeans wrote:I try to live with this attitude as well, but if we are going to run any kind of decent Map Foundry, we should just keep in mind not to attack an artist personally. And if you feel strongly about one thing or another, feel free to voice your honest opinion, be it good or bad.
We!? WE?!? I don't think TBK and me have had a problem with personally attacking an artist, while you've gotten borderline. Whatever. I'm sick of arguing with you.
Users browsing this forum: Pochuco