Norman times would be great.. it is what most people think about when it comes to great castles.

The preceding "anglo-saxon" centuries were politically weak times and the Danes controlled much of England - sometimes all of it. Such a map should include more than Britain imo and require a lot more ...

I still don't see how this map is "entirely unique" to the CC site as you claim

I think it is pretty original to base it on a 17th century map while still calling it medieval or whatever..

..someone should make a map of North America (without Mexico) but call it StonedAgeCanada. That will also ...

isaiah40 wrote:Okay guys, that will be enough of this.

agreed..

If you want to continue this, please do it via pm's!!

Please don´t encourage him/her/whatever. I´m not in the least interested in any continuation or pm:s regarding this!! (or any other homegrown racist theories)

If the CFS was not that large and threatening, the BWAC would not have been called. I have seen maps where in 1884 the CFS was almost the same size as the DRC...

Stop looking at fake maps like that. That´s completely ridiculous and unhistorical. Read books on history instead of staring at ...

just double-check what you see in that map. It has lots of errors.

It seems even universities have a problem understanding that the berlin conference was no treaty representing true political, military or economic control.

small example: Congo free state didn´t conquer Katanga/Garanganze until -91 ...

aha.. gotya.. I misunderstood within what context the word classic was used. Ignore my previous comment.

Your definition of "classic" seems a bit peculiar.. makes me think of something very old and original that later things are modeled upon - not simply another word for great.
I´m sure it could be called classic australian within that specific geographical context, but it´s hardly one of the truly ...