What a bunch of Bull Shit. I for one do not accept the apology. The lack of planning and forsight has most likely cost me two games not to mention the loss of rank and the best CC can do is say sorry. Thanks for nothing.

This is what I find interesting in this discussion; a CC player who posts a banner from a CHILDS CARTOON is attempting, poorly I might add, to post some type of insult by calling me a girl. I have to ask, what colour is your school backpack skippy? The other CC player posting is a habitual deadbeat ...

If the intent of the scoring system is to make everybody feel warm and fuzzy, then take up knitting. Who cares if the weak get feasted upon, that is simply life. Look around you it happens every day. I am personnaly not interested in some sociallist collective with everybody looking at the pretty ...

I am ranked 2198 with 205 played and 62 won. The player ranked at 2197 has played 1733 and won 396. Simply by playing more games does not assure a higher rank. Oh you bet I feed on the weak when I can, I have also taken on the same and higher ranks. There is more in the drop and dice than one may ...

With all contest in life sometimes you're the shark sometimes you're the bait. The truly good players will get better and the others, well, will not. If you don't want to get hurt stay in bed. A flat scoring system, or any system that exihbts fairness is better. Who cares if the top dog has 15,000 ...

Again; the points system needs changing, handicapping is not working. There must be a set amount of points avaiable for the victor, yes I know its a max of 100. It is obvious by the rankings that playing the most games is not the way to the top of the charts. Again, having the higher rank should not ...

In a response to Treefiddy, not much for him to comment on since he has an awful habit of going deadbeat when defeat is pending. Check his games. Thats fair

The point system is obviously flawed. If in any game the 2nd player out of the game loses as many points as the player who finishes 2nd or the last player out before the end of the game, regardless of rank, isn't fair. The point system needs to be set so the player finishing last loses the most ...

The argument posted by the 1 exile is groundless considering the #4 ranked player has a 39% win percentage and the #9 ranked player has a 32% win percentage. To suggest that I am not worthy of my rank is frankly, insulting. This is a discussion about the inequity of points awarded V deducted ...

The explanation of points awarded v deducted doen't make any sense. If you take for example a player who deadbeats a game will/can lose less than a player who finishes 2nd or 3rd. To suggest that a player can be awarded 8 points for winning in a 2 player game than lose 30 points for losing a 2 ...

If it to late for this tourney, please let me know of another all Canadian tourney in the future.

Attrition