I won this 3-0.Vinyl-Taliban wrote:I'd like to challenge chris.yfc.
Home: Game 15529058
Random: Game 15529059
PM and invites sent.
Search found 85 matches
- Thu Apr 16, 2015 2:39 pm
- Forum: SoC Training Grounds
- Topic: SoC 1v1 Ladder Challenge (CLOSED)
- Replies: 4610
- Views: 2082631
Re: SoC 1v1 Ladder Challenge
- Thu Apr 09, 2015 6:29 am
- Forum: SoC Training Grounds
- Topic: SoC 1v1 Ladder Challenge (CLOSED)
- Replies: 4610
- Views: 2082631
- Sun Apr 05, 2015 5:49 am
- Forum: Acceptable Content
- Topic: Sharia law
- Replies: 48
- Views: 11901
Re: Sharia law
You don't live under sharia law. Sharia law can be an add on, or complimentary to the law of the land. Happens in England for example. Both parties have to agree to be tried under sharia law. In Australia we have some sentencing and law courts dealing with aboriginal tribal laws and practises ...
- Sun Apr 05, 2015 1:36 am
- Forum: SoC Training Grounds
- Topic: SoC 1v1 Ladder Challenge (CLOSED)
- Replies: 4610
- Views: 2082631
Re: SoC 1v1 Ladder Challenge
I would like to challenge Vinyl-Taliban
pm sent
My games are
#15463873
#15463875 random-void
invite sent, pw is Ladder if needed
Accepted. Home game invite out. 15470043
I didn't notice before accepting sorry, but the random game is not sunny as per the rules. Please make another one ...
pm sent
My games are
#15463873
#15463875 random-void
invite sent, pw is Ladder if needed
Accepted. Home game invite out. 15470043
I didn't notice before accepting sorry, but the random game is not sunny as per the rules. Please make another one ...
- Fri Apr 03, 2015 8:48 am
- Forum: SoC Training Grounds
- Topic: Callout -- New Guide Program Beginning Soon! Guides Needed
- Replies: 431
- Views: 989262
Re: Callout -- New Guide Program Beginning Soon! Guides Need
I'd be happy to help out dhallmeyer.
- Sat Mar 21, 2015 10:39 pm
- Forum: SoC Training Grounds
- Topic: SoC 1v1 Ladder Challenge (CLOSED)
- Replies: 4610
- Views: 2082631
Re: SoC 1v1 Ladder Challenge
Vinyl-Taliban wrote:Accepted. Home game invite out. Game 15470043torres44cm wrote:I would like to challenge Vinyl-Taliban
pm sent
My games are
#15463873
#15463875 random
invite sent, pw is Ladder if needed
I didn't notice before accepting sorry, but the random game is not sunny as per the rules. Please make another one.
- Sat Mar 21, 2015 10:36 pm
- Forum: SoC Training Grounds
- Topic: SoC 1v1 Ladder Challenge (CLOSED)
- Replies: 4610
- Views: 2082631
Re: SoC 1v1 Ladder Challenge
Accepted. Home game invite out. Game 15470043torres44cm wrote:I would like to challenge Vinyl-Taliban
pm sent
My games are
#15463873
#15463875 random
invite sent, pw is Ladder if needed
- Mon Mar 02, 2015 11:30 am
- Forum: SoC Training Grounds
- Topic: SoC 1v1 Ladder Challenge (CLOSED)
- Replies: 4610
- Views: 2082631
Re: SoC 1v1 Ladder Challenge
I won this 2-1.
- Sun Feb 22, 2015 6:43 am
- Forum: SoC Training Grounds
- Topic: SoC 1v1 Ladder Challenge (CLOSED)
- Replies: 4610
- Views: 2082631
Re: SoC 1v1 Ladder Challenge
- Mon Feb 09, 2015 3:10 am
- Forum: SoC Training Grounds
- Topic: SoC 1v1 Ladder Challenge (CLOSED)
- Replies: 4610
- Views: 2082631
Re: SoC 1v1 Ladder Challenge
Thanks.celliottii wrote:I got this match recorded for you...Vinyl-Taliban wrote:
I won this 2-1.
I now challenge Philbro.
Home: Game 15332211
Random:Game 15332213
PM sent.
- Mon Feb 09, 2015 12:15 am
- Forum: SoC Training Grounds
- Topic: SoC 1v1 Ladder Challenge (CLOSED)
- Replies: 4610
- Views: 2082631
Re: SoC 1v1 Ladder Challenge
I won this 2-1.
- Sat Feb 07, 2015 3:49 am
- Forum: Acceptable Content
- Topic: Why is the US constantly sowing discord in South China Sea?
- Replies: 229
- Views: 57411
Re: Why is the US constantly sowing discord in South China S
It's also interesting to note that current US policy towards long-term ally Thailand has pushed Thailand closer to China.
Military exercises with the US have been scaled back in favour of a deeper,wider parnership with China.
There's lots going on in the region for China to capitalise on IMO.
Military exercises with the US have been scaled back in favour of a deeper,wider parnership with China.
There's lots going on in the region for China to capitalise on IMO.
- Wed Feb 04, 2015 12:50 am
- Forum: Acceptable Content
- Topic: The official conspiracy theory of 9/11
- Replies: 228
- Views: 56267
Re: The official conspiracy theory of 9/11
See section 3.3 of the final WTC7 report. I draw your particular attention to:
"SHAMRC, a software program that is used for analysis of explosive detonations, shock propagation and structure loads due to blast and fragments, was used to simulate pressure histories from hypothetical blasts."; and ...
"SHAMRC, a software program that is used for analysis of explosive detonations, shock propagation and structure loads due to blast and fragments, was used to simulate pressure histories from hypothetical blasts."; and ...
- Mon Feb 02, 2015 11:57 pm
- Forum: Acceptable Content
- Topic: The official conspiracy theory of 9/11
- Replies: 228
- Views: 56267
Re: The official conspiracy theory of 9/11
Yes they heard an explosion.
Next.
Next.
- Mon Feb 02, 2015 11:51 pm
- Forum: Acceptable Content
- Topic: The official conspiracy theory of 9/11
- Replies: 228
- Views: 56267
Re: The official conspiracy theory of 9/11
Indeed.AndyDufresne wrote:I'd probably say things were exploding too. That is the poetic beauty of language. You can choose so many words for varying effects.
--Andy
It really isn't surprising that explosions were heard given there were fires raging for 7 hours.
- Mon Feb 02, 2015 11:47 pm
- Forum: Acceptable Content
- Topic: The official conspiracy theory of 9/11
- Replies: 228
- Views: 56267
Re: The official conspiracy theory of 9/11
Such panache.
When in doubt, invert, and claim troll.
When in doubt, invert, and claim troll.
- Mon Feb 02, 2015 11:10 pm
- Forum: Acceptable Content
- Topic: The official conspiracy theory of 9/11
- Replies: 228
- Views: 56267
Re: The official conspiracy theory of 9/11
Yeah, but that's why we don't let chimps make decisions. Reasonable decisions require putting info together.
Loud sound. Hunched, taken aback response from a fireman, fireman says 7's exploding, fireman agrees.
Three firefighters all reacting consistent with an explosion, and speaking consistent ...
Loud sound. Hunched, taken aback response from a fireman, fireman says 7's exploding, fireman agrees.
Three firefighters all reacting consistent with an explosion, and speaking consistent ...
- Mon Feb 02, 2015 10:34 pm
- Forum: Acceptable Content
- Topic: The official conspiracy theory of 9/11
- Replies: 228
- Views: 56267
Re: The official conspiracy theory of 9/11
When you say this you are being utterly dishonest:
You continually repeat there was no evidence. I guess experts, first hand witnesses recorded in situ, physical evidence and a long line of engineering and forensic practices aren't sufficient for you as they are for the rest of the world.
Arguing ...
You continually repeat there was no evidence. I guess experts, first hand witnesses recorded in situ, physical evidence and a long line of engineering and forensic practices aren't sufficient for you as they are for the rest of the world.
Arguing ...
- Mon Feb 02, 2015 10:27 pm
- Forum: Acceptable Content
- Topic: The official conspiracy theory of 9/11
- Replies: 228
- Views: 56267
Re: The official conspiracy theory of 9/11
Someone says 'explosion' from what I can make out._sabotage_ wrote:
Actually, you haven't addressed any of my issues with your conspiracy theory, but since you said you did, here's a video I posted a few pages back.
Can you tell me what the firemen are saying?
And so what?
- Mon Feb 02, 2015 10:22 pm
- Forum: Acceptable Content
- Topic: The official conspiracy theory of 9/11
- Replies: 228
- Views: 56267
Re: The official conspiracy theory of 9/11
Vinyl-Taliban wrote:And stop deflecting. Tell me why 'if explosions then explosives' is logically correct.
I won't hold my breath.
- Mon Feb 02, 2015 10:16 pm
- Forum: Acceptable Content
- Topic: The official conspiracy theory of 9/11
- Replies: 228
- Views: 56267
Re: The official conspiracy theory of 9/11
And stop deflecting. Tell me why 'if explosions then explosives' is logically correct.
I won't hold my breath.
I won't hold my breath.
- Mon Feb 02, 2015 10:14 pm
- Forum: Acceptable Content
- Topic: The official conspiracy theory of 9/11
- Replies: 228
- Views: 56267
Re: The official conspiracy theory of 9/11
I've discussed the points you've made and pointed out fallacies, contradictions and straight up lies.
You address the objections raised.
And please stop suggesting you've brought original analysis to the table, you haven't.
You address the objections raised.
And please stop suggesting you've brought original analysis to the table, you haven't.
- Mon Feb 02, 2015 10:00 pm
- Forum: Acceptable Content
- Topic: The official conspiracy theory of 9/11
- Replies: 228
- Views: 56267
Re: The official conspiracy theory of 9/11
When you say this you are being utterly dishonest:
You continually repeat there was no evidence. I guess experts, first hand witnesses recorded in situ, physical evidence and a long line of engineering and forensic practices aren't sufficient for you as they are for the rest of the world.
Arguing ...
You continually repeat there was no evidence. I guess experts, first hand witnesses recorded in situ, physical evidence and a long line of engineering and forensic practices aren't sufficient for you as they are for the rest of the world.
Arguing ...
- Mon Feb 02, 2015 9:48 pm
- Forum: Acceptable Content
- Topic: The official conspiracy theory of 9/11
- Replies: 228
- Views: 56267
Re: The official conspiracy theory of 9/11
I deleted my reply to see if you'd make it 4 consecutive posts where you ask what I do. Must be a record. And I said infatuated. Difference and probably true.
Here it is then:
And given your off-topic infatuation with what I do:
I previously worked as a civil servant on secondment to various ...
Here it is then:
And given your off-topic infatuation with what I do:
I previously worked as a civil servant on secondment to various ...
- Mon Feb 02, 2015 12:24 pm
- Forum: Acceptable Content
- Topic: The official conspiracy theory of 9/11
- Replies: 228
- Views: 56267
Re: The official conspiracy theory of 9/11
Repeat after me:
There is no evidence to support a hypothesis of CD and therefore no scientific justification for forming it, let alone investigating it.
Where's the seismic activity from the explosions? Or are you back at silent explosives?
Nah, it was me farting wasn't it, let's be honest. I ...
There is no evidence to support a hypothesis of CD and therefore no scientific justification for forming it, let alone investigating it.
Where's the seismic activity from the explosions? Or are you back at silent explosives?
Nah, it was me farting wasn't it, let's be honest. I ...