your the only one who thought it was public seeing as it was posted as rt in the gabbley chat. any way why would that be cheating or abuse?

Because you feedback is false and irrelevant:

"Feedback Guidelines

* Leave only fair and factual comments that relate to a specific game.
* Do not leave ...

sportdaqking wrote:thank you g force at least some1 can understand what i am trying to tell him

What what I'm trying to tell you is that when blue failed to take over green the game was over. And it didn't matter whether or not I was away or whether or not it was an RT( it was a public game....)

we would have waited for you to take you go BUT YOU HAD LEFT

So what difference would it have made for the game if I took my turn right after they moved or 23 hours later? I point here is that it didn't matter. Blue tried to take out green but failed, and it had nothing to do with me leaving for ...

also u had to wait 30 minutes while people took thier go we had to wait 30 minutes for u to come back

I though you said they didn't wait... so once again you are saying that you have the right to make me wait half an hour for my turn, but I don't have the same right?

Then I guess you are right ...

Ok listen... this was not freestyle, so me being away on my turn has no effect on what they did before my move. Do you understand that? No where in the chat did they say that they will attack each other because I was away. When green came back he right way attack blue...

Why didn't they decide to ...

The conversation went like this as he had gone into gabbley
2007-03-19 02:07:22 - sportdaqking: 2 more minutes then thats 15mins hes been gone
2007-03-19 02:07:44 - sportdaqking: u here yellow?
2007-03-19 02:08:33 - richardgarr: i went to chat he is still there
2007-03-19 02:08:47 - sportdaqking ...

So yah, being so good at this game gets you a personals haters club :)

So I got this feedback for 'ruining a good game'

actual feedback:
"starts an rt game and decides to dissapear for 90 minutes causing other
players to destroy what was turning out to be a really good game"

There are a number ...

thanks wicked.

wicked wrote:you can't be serious? fine, tell me who left it.

SolidWolf34

Genghis Khan CA wrote:lol I can't believe someone is getting so worked up about positive feedback...

Because it's not a real positive feedback. It is fake and only allows that jerk to continue to be a jerk.

This one person left me a positive feedback for the game played days ago. He left it just to spite me because I refuse to play him.

Can it be removed? Because the feedback is fake.



Why would you want a positive feedback removed? :roll:

because it's fake... So, unless it's blatantly ...

Beastly wrote:

hobojjr wrote:This one person left me a positive feedback for the game played days ago. He left it just to spite me because I refuse to play him.

Can it be removed? Because the feedback is fake.

Why would you want a positive feedback removed?

because it's fake...

This one person left me a positive feedback for the game played days ago. He left it just to spite me because I refuse to play him.

Can it be removed? Because the feedback is fake.

Don't you think this would be a waste of wicked's time. I looked at your feedback, couldn't tell which one was ...

This one person left me a positive feedback for the game played days ago. He left it just to spite me because I refuse to play him.

Can it be removed? Because the feedback is fake.

everywhere116 wrote:How can people abuse it?

uhmmm

begin:
they spam
i mute
they leave
they comeback
loop;

and by they I mean one person entering from ten different sessions.

Ok please there needs to be a better chat system than gabber... some people keep abusing it and there is nothing that can be done about it except getting a better system.

Player A is playing poorly, so his teammates boot him.
Player B is dominating the entire map, so everyone else boots him.
Player C misses a turn so they boot him.

If someone misses three turns, they are booted regardless.

You can't boot him if he replies...

1) you cast a vote to boot a player ...

spiesr wrote:To easyily abused...

how??

Dr. Jim wrote:Most games aren't teams.

Well, it doesn't make sense to have it for non team games... one can care less if your opponent is afk because it doesn't affect your strategy...

Kicking afk in team games.

See, then the problem arises that some dishonest players will vote to kick out the powerhouse player while he is afk in a non-rt game, and he won't respond and then he will get booted for no reason

No, everyone on both teams have to vote. So if his team votes to boot him then he is most likely ...

There should be an option to boot players, like the once that never play, from a team game. So people pass a vote against a player and if that player doesn't reply he gets booted.

We have a good game going but there is an afk on the other team and it's screwing up their game...

These constant threads highlight a problem.

What problem?

1. The dice really are bad and these threads are proof.

2. Newbs are idiots.

3. No one reads the FAQ/understands them.

4. Many people have only a dim grasp of dispersion, central tendency and long term dice probabilities.

5. It's ...

NO, it wasn't autoattack...

hitting lows 4 times in a row....... there has to be something wrong with the randomizer...

and not only did I lose the 10 armies vs 3 but then I lost every other army on the same turn.......... so that would be +4 dice throws and losing every time...

10 vs 3........ 10 lost

I think there is a problem with your algorithm or something......

What comes after 20???