I love morons like you who have achieved nothing in the game and yet feel free to make generalised assumptions
Hahah. You're just the type I figured this thread would reveal. You're bothered by it, because it's correct. So, I actually have to achieve something before I can make generalized ...
Search found 8 matches
- Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:32 pm
- Forum: Conquer Club Discussion
- Topic: High ranked players = true wimps
- Replies: 64
- Views: 9612
- Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:57 am
- Forum: Conquer Club Discussion
- Topic: High ranked players = true wimps
- Replies: 64
- Views: 9612
You complain that ranks wont play lesser ranks yet when they do you call it mining points, unscramble your brains man.
Do I have to spell everything out for you? The high ranks only play the low ranks when they are on teams and in games they are basically guaranteed to win (them + their high rank ...
Do I have to spell everything out for you? The high ranks only play the low ranks when they are on teams and in games they are basically guaranteed to win (them + their high rank ...
- Fri Mar 21, 2008 10:52 am
- Forum: Conquer Club Discussion
- Topic: High ranked players = true wimps
- Replies: 64
- Views: 9612
- Thu Mar 20, 2008 3:03 pm
- Forum: Conquer Club Discussion
- Topic: High ranked players = true wimps
- Replies: 64
- Views: 9612
- Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:19 am
- Forum: Conquer Club Discussion
- Topic: High ranked players = true wimps
- Replies: 64
- Views: 9612
High ranked players = true wimps
Come on guys. Once you hit 2000 points you have to run off and join your clans and play your private games because you are afraid of losing them?
Does your CC rank mean that much to you?
Just now, I selected Standard, Terminator, Assassin, public, waiting for players
and in 4 pages of scrolling ...
Does your CC rank mean that much to you?
Just now, I selected Standard, Terminator, Assassin, public, waiting for players
and in 4 pages of scrolling ...
- Sat Feb 16, 2008 11:22 am
- Forum: Conquer Club Discussion
- Topic: 20v3, lose 7-3 follow by 12v3 and lose 9-1...is this normal?
- Replies: 35
- Views: 4264
These dice are seriously fucked. It's getting to be impossible to play these games because you don't know when a megashit roll is going to hit you and basically ruin your game.
In this game, 1782840, I have 4 cards and cash a set of 20, I deploy 28 on 9, and I need to take 16 armies on 6 countries ...
In this game, 1782840, I have 4 cards and cash a set of 20, I deploy 28 on 9, and I need to take 16 armies on 6 countries ...
- Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:23 pm
- Forum: Conquer Club Discussion
- Topic: 20v3, lose 7-3 follow by 12v3 and lose 9-1...is this normal?
- Replies: 35
- Views: 4264
The funny thing here is that the losses the poster is stating aren't even that bad. Maybe the 20-vs-3... but the others are not even bad enough to be called "bad dice".
To lose 7 armies attacking 3, you are right, that isn't what I would label that bad. But to follow that up with losing 9 armies ...
To lose 7 armies attacking 3, you are right, that isn't what I would label that bad. But to follow that up with losing 9 armies ...
- Sun Feb 10, 2008 9:36 pm
- Forum: Conquer Club Discussion
- Topic: 20v3, lose 7-3 follow by 12v3 and lose 9-1...is this normal?
- Replies: 35
- Views: 4264
20v3, lose 7-3 follow by 12v3 and lose 9-1...is this normal?
To lose 17 armies to 4 in 2 auto attacks?
I haven't played very many games yet, but this was just absurd. There is no way the dice engine is correct with a roll like that. It basically devestated my game and cost me ~60 points.
I haven't played very many games yet, but this was just absurd. There is no way the dice engine is correct with a roll like that. It basically devestated my game and cost me ~60 points.