Eh, why not. Count me in.

slacker!

seriously, thanks so much for your hard work setting this up! i'm really looking forward to it.

bluenose wrote:Put me down for the circus maximus

GOING DOWN, PUNK!

I'll take Circus Maximus. Let's rumble!

Has anybody actually run hypothesis tests on the data set used? I'd be interested in seeing the results.
There's a dice analyzer in the Plug-Ins section, a lot of people post their results if you want to look for them. The probabilities always end up where they should.

But still, the data set is ...

cause you really give a dang what i think...

My issue with the dice is that the random atmospheric generation is great IF you have a constant stream of new data coming in. The set that is used technically comes from a random source, but the fact that it's a closed set is a problem.

Has anybody ...